A well-performing store can encourage another location. Existing profits do not establish how much capital the new store needs or whether it beats alternative investments.
Capital returns need a complete investment case
01Build incremental cash flows
Include capex, deposits, opening inventory, pre-opening expenses, working capital and ramp-up cash flows. Separate additional expenditure from existing HQ allocations. If expansion actually requires more management or systems, include those costs. Allow for cannibalization of existing stores.
02EBITDA does not establish capital efficiency
EBITDA helps assess operating earnings, but excludes depreciation, tax, capex and working capital. ROIC relates operating profit after tax to invested capital under consistent definitions; incremental ROIC focuses on additional profit over additional capital. EBITDA margin is not a substitute for incremental ROIC.
03Stress timing and revenue
Illustrative example: the store expects operating break-even after six months. Test a three-month delay, revenue 20% below plan and higher inventory needs. Identify the largest cash shortfall, funding sources and whether the whole system retains its cash buffer. Operating break-even does not mean the initial investment has been recovered.
04Compare other uses of capital
Compare a new store with improvements to existing stores, faster inventory turnover or online development. NPV and payback help when assumptions and cash flows are appropriate; a universal threshold should not ignore risk and strategy. Release funding against milestones and define adjustment conditions in advance.
Key takeaway
Assess expansion through incremental cash flow and capital returns, including effects on the whole system.
All numerical examples are hypothetical, not client results. Definitions, assumptions and business context affect the conclusion.
Back to Retail ↗